<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Auckland Transport Blog &#187; Observations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transportblog.co.nz/category/observations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transportblog.co.nz</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:00:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The benefits of making off-peak PT useful</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/06/27/the-benefits-of-making-off-peak-pt-useful/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/06/27/the-benefits-of-making-off-peak-pt-useful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bus routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=4738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On Friday I had a meeting in Manukau City, and our work car was being used by someone else, so I thought I&#8217;d honour my public transport commitments and catch the bus down there from the CBD. The weather was utterly horrible, but I can&#8217;t really complain about the bus trip in terms of its reliability [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday I had a meeting in <a href="http://www.manukau.govt.nz" target="_blank">Manukau City</a>, and our work car was being used by someone else, so I thought I&#8217;d honour my public transport commitments and catch the bus down there from the CBD. The weather was utterly horrible, but I can&#8217;t really complain about the bus trip in terms of its reliability &#8211; in that it showed up at both ends exactly when expected, it arrived at Manukau City pretty much exactly on time and so forth. Furthermore, when I boarded the bus and offered a $10 note saying &#8220;Manukay City thanks&#8221; the bus driver asked whether I was coming back the same day, and then once I said yes, suggested that a $10 &#8220;bus about&#8221; pass would give me the best deal. I really like and appreciate that level of customer care and concern (so big kudos to the driver of the <a href="http://www.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20south/Papakura_April%2010%20V2.1%20web.pdf" target="_blank">471 bus</a> that left Britomart at 10.30 on Friday). So certainly I could not have realistically expected the public transport service to be much better than it was.</p>
<p>What was interesting though was to note the people on board the bus (which went up and down at various points of the 50 minute each way trip). While there was quite a mix of types, including what seemed like most of a kindergarten class at one point, what seemed particularly noticeable to me was a big absence of people between around 20 and 65 years of age. This dichotomy, with only the old and the young seeming to use public transport, was also evident last weekend when I visited New Lynn train station to take some photos of how it&#8217;s coming along. All the people waiting for the train, or for a bus at the rather sad looking old New Lynn bus terminal, once again either seemed to be teenagers or pensioners.</p>
<p>I suppose that the obvious conclusion to come to is that during these &#8220;off-peak&#8221; times, generally it seems as though the only people who use public transport are those who don&#8217;t own a car: either they&#8217;re too young, too old or too poor. Now obviously it&#8217;s crucial that public transport is there for these people, as if they had no transport choices whatsoever it would be grossly unfair, but it does seem to me as though the whole off-peak public transport system is designed around the idea of only providing for those who unable/unwilling to drive &#8211; in other words, it&#8217;s a second-class system with nobody there by choice.</p>
<p>One only has to look at how busy Auckland&#8217;s road remain at weekends and during &#8216;inter-peak&#8217; times on weekdays to realise that an awful lot of people still need to get around the city during these off peak times. The majority of trips in urban areas aren&#8217;t commuting trips, but rather simple &#8220;errands&#8221; trips &#8211; getting milk from the diary, dropping the kids at school or at a friend&#8217;s house, visiting friends and so forth. Yet it would seem that for just about all these trips, one would only ever use public transport if you didn&#8217;t have a choice.</p>
<p>In some respects, off-peak car trips aren&#8217;t so much of a problem as long-peak hour commuting trips &#8211; for which public transport can offer a service that people would choose to use over driving (although generally only where public transport priority exists in the form of bus lanes or a railway line, or when parking costs a lot). Congestion is lower during off-peak times, so the benefits of removing vehicles from the road through offering a better public transport option aren&#8217;t seen as so significant &#8211; or at least that appears to be the argument in <a href="http://www.nzta.govt.nz/resources/economic-evaluation-manual/volume-2/index.html" target="_blank">NZTA&#8217;s economic evaluation manual</a> when it comes to assessing the benefits of public transport:<a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/economic-benefits-pt2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4739" title="economic-benefits-pt" src="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/economic-benefits-pt2.jpg" alt="" width="800" height="426" /></a> As you can see, the benefits (particularly the &#8220;road traffic reduction benefits&#8221;) are way higher for getting peak time PT boardings than off-peak PT boardings.</p>
<p>However, this misses something potentially quite important. As I was slowly making my way out to Manukau on the bus (and this would have worked even better on a train) I was able to read through some background information relating to the meeting that I was attending, and I was able to keep up with emails and so forth. In short, I was able to to productive in a way that simply wouldn&#8217;t have been possible if I was driving my way out there. Sure, the bus trip seemed to take forever (another thing that hopefully a <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/09/11/manukau-rail-link/" target="_blank">train service</a> would improve upon), but surely there was an economic gain from me being able to be somewhat productive during that time.</p>
<p>People have to travel between offices to attend meetings all the time when it comes to their work, and I imagine in Auckland that about 99.99% of those trips at the moment are undertaken by car or by taxi (the latter of which I suppose enables the possibility of being productive while on the go, but of course is very expensive). To me that seems like a huge amount of lost economic activity &#8211; with everyone driving when (at least theoretically) if they were on a bus or train they could be being somewhat productive with that time.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s causing the almost complete absence of people making public transport trips for these purposes? Well I got a clue when I said that I&#8217;d think about catching the bus out to Manukau, with the general response being along the lines of &#8220;good luck with that&#8221;. In short, it would seem as though the image problem faced by public transport is particularly severe when it comes to off-peak public transport. Sure, I could have done my trip quite a bit faster by car (which is an issue that needs attention in my opinion), but otherwise the service was reasonably convenient, reasonably inexpensive ($10 return wouldn&#8217;t have paid the petrol between the CBD and Manukau return I suspect, and pales into insignificance compared to a taxi fare or rental car) and everything turned up when it should have &#8211; so it was reliable.</p>
<p>Perhaps some of the answer is a hangover from when Auckland&#8217;s public transport was truly terrible. Perhaps some is because we rarely hear about public transport when it goes right, only when it goes wrong. Perhaps it is some sort of anti-bus bias &#8211; that perhaps could be resolved through the upcoming rail link to Manukau (even more so when we have sparkly new train to run on it).</p>
<p>In the end, I think there are significant, and real, benefits out of somehow breaking down this mentality that you&#8217;d only use public transport for a non-commuting trip if you didn&#8217;t have any alternative. Workers could be more productive, workplaces could save significant amounts of money currently spent on rental cars, taxi-fares and so forth, and unnecessary car trips could be eliminated &#8211; with the resulting environmental benefits that would bring. However, I really do think that something drastic needs to be done to improve the image of public transport for this to be possible, and &#8211; critically &#8211; it needs to be a lot faster. Spending almost two hours of Friday on a bus really did rip a big chunk out of my day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/06/27/the-benefits-of-making-off-peak-pt-useful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Early Link Buses</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/04/27/early-link-buses/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/04/27/early-link-buses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 21:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Buses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Bus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=4031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A rather odd bus experience going on at the moment.</p>
<p>Usually I catch the 004/005 bus to work, but today I was already in Ponsonby for breakfast so the Link Bus was the next one into town. While I waited forever at traffic lights to cross College Hill I noticed a Link Bus sitting at its stop [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rather odd bus experience going on at the moment.</p>
<p>Usually I catch the 004/005 bus to work, but today I was already in Ponsonby for breakfast so the Link Bus was the next one into town. While I waited forever at traffic lights to cross College Hill I noticed a Link Bus sitting at its stop for a good 3-4 minutes with the driver outside having a smoke. I figured the bus must have broken down and asked him that question, although it seemed odd as people were still on the bus. He replied that they were running &#8220;early&#8221;.</p>
<p>Cue another couple of minutes while he finished the cigarette, before I got on the bus and we were on our way. Then we reached the usual waiting point at Victoria Park, bus driver says &#8220;three and a half minutes and we&#8217;ll be on our way&#8221; and jumps off the bus again to have another smoke. Passengers look bewildered, passengers wanting to get on the bus look even more confused when they see no driver.</p>
<p>Apart from the oddness of the situation, it does make me wonder how we should deal with &#8220;early buses&#8221;, especially on the Link route where they will naturally catch each other and bunch. I see the logic for sticking to timetables, but those poor passengers whose bus sat there going nowhere for around 7-8 minutes all up are hardly getting a good experience.</p>
<p>Ideas? Better solutions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/04/27/early-link-buses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 million Aucklanders by 2031</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/02/25/2-million-aucklanders-by-2031/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/02/25/2-million-aucklanders-by-2031/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Population Growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics NZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=3164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A press release by Statistics New Zealand today indicates that Auckland&#8217;s population will be pretty close to 2 million by 2031 &#8211; only 21 years away. Here&#8217;s the press release in full:</p>
<p>Auckland home to 38 percent of population in 2031</p>
<p>The Auckland region is projected to account for 60 percent of New Zealand&#8217;s population growth between 2006 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/estimates_and_projections/SubnationalPopulationProjections_MR2031.aspx" target="_blank">press release by Statistics New Zealand</a> today indicates that Auckland&#8217;s population will be pretty close to 2 million by 2031 &#8211; only 21 years away. Here&#8217;s the press release in full:</p>
<blockquote><p><em><strong>Auckland home to 38 percent of population in 2031</strong></em></p>
<p><em>The Auckland region is projected to account for 60 percent of New Zealand&#8217;s population growth between 2006 and 2031, with an increase of 570,000 from 1.37 million to 1.94 million, Statistics New Zealand said today. &#8220;The Auckland region would be home to 38 percent of New Zealand&#8217;s population in 2031, compared with 33 percent in 2006,&#8221; Population Statistics manager Denise McGregor said. Natural increase (births minus deaths) is projected to account for almost two-thirds of the population growth, with the remainder due to net migration gains.</em></p>
<p><em>Of New Zealand&#8217;s 73 territorial authority areas, 44 are projected to have more people in 2031 than in 2006. However, population growth will generally slow over the projection period because of the narrowing gap between births and deaths. The highest growth rates between 2006 and 2031 are expected in Queenstown-Lakes district (an average of 2.2 percent a year) and Selwyn district (2.0 percent). Manukau city and Rodney district (1.7 percent), Waimakariri district (1.6 percent), Tauranga city (1.5 percent) and Franklin district (1.4 percent), are also projected to experience relatively high population growth. </em></p>
<p><em>All territorial authority areas will have more older people in the future. In 2031, 34 areas will have more than double the number of people aged 65 years and over, than in 2006. Selwyn district is projected to be home to almost four times the number of people aged 65 years and over in 2031, than in 2006, while Queenstown-Lakes will be home to over three times. Nationally, the number of older people (those aged 65 years and over) is projected to double between 2006 and 2031. &#8220;The increase in older people is due to higher life expectancy, accentuated by the baby boomers born during the 1950s and 1960s entering these ages,&#8221; Mrs McGregor said.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Somewhat hilariously, the <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10628238" target="_blank">New Zealand Herald website</a> is reporting that by 2031 60% of all New Zealanders will be living in Auckland. Ummm&#8230;. no, that&#8217;s 60% of the country&#8217;s population growth between now and 2031 will be in Auckland.</p>
<p>Now one could suggest that as 60% of the country&#8217;s population <em>growth</em> will be in Auckland over the next 21 years, perhaps 60% of the transport spending in the country on new infrastructure should also be in Auckland. After all, one doesn&#8217;t really need to widen roads or build new railway lines in places whose population isn&#8217;t getting any larger you would think. Generally Auckland has struggled to keep up with its population growth in terms of providing infrastructure &#8211; particularly during the 1980s and 1990s when it seems like not much at all was built (maybe our political thinking at the time was hoping &#8220;the market&#8221; would come along and build it for us?)</p>
<p>One would think that by 2031 we would need to have built the<a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/tag/cbd-rail-tunnel/" target="_blank"> CBD Rail Tunnel</a>, <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/23/airport-wakes-up-to-importance-of-pt/" target="_blank">Rail to the Airport</a>, some sort of <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/tag/howickbotany-line/" target="_blank">Howick/Botany Line</a>, perhaps <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/tag/north-shore-line/" target="_blank">rail to the North Shore</a> and a whole pile of other important transport projects.  I tend to think that if Auckland&#8217;s population can grow to 2 million <em>well</em>, then a city of that size is perhaps a bit more useful than where we are now. I can&#8217;t help but feel that Auckland is a slightly annoying size at the moment: big enough to suffer many of the problems of a larger city such as congestion, but too small to be able to fund projects necessary to do something about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/02/25/2-million-aucklanders-by-2031/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Question</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/30/a-question/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/30/a-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 10:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timetable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This may well be the shortest blog post of all times, but it is to raise a question that I have never had properly explained:</p>
<p>Why is is that Sunday&#8217;s public transport service levels have to be worse than Saturday&#8217;s?</p>
<p> In all my catching of public transport over the years I&#8217;ve seen no real evidence that patronage [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may well be the shortest blog post of all times, but it is to raise a question that I have never had properly explained:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Why is is that Sunday&#8217;s public transport service levels have to be worse than Saturday&#8217;s?</em></p></blockquote>
<p><em></em> In all my catching of public transport over the years I&#8217;ve seen no real evidence that patronage is much less on a Sunday than a Saturday, except for in the evening. So why can&#8217;t we just have a &#8220;weekend timetable&#8221;, rather than separate, complex and confusing timetables that separate the two days? If we were really smart we&#8217;d match up the off-peak weekday timetable with the weekend one, so that people travelling off-peak would know the timetable was the same seven days a week.</p>
<p>Is this difference between Saturdays and Sundays perhaps a hangover from the days when everyone was paid more on Sundays, and companies tried to reduce their wage bill by cutting back on services?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/30/a-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good ideas from around NZ</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/18/good-ideas-from-around-nz/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/18/good-ideas-from-around-nz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 05:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Harris</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christchurch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of good ideas that add to urban livability and sustainability that I saw during my recent travels that I haven&#8217;t seen in Auckland and cannot see why we don&#8217;t have them.</p>
<p>Firstly Bicycle Cops:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p>Come on, even the yanks have these. The downtown station in Auckland is a beat only station while [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are a couple of good ideas that add to urban livability and sustainability that I saw during my recent travels that I haven&#8217;t seen in Auckland and cannot see why we don&#8217;t have them.</p>
<p>Firstly Bicycle Cops:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt348/NZJeremy/048.jpg" alt="" width="777" height="614" /></p>
<p>Come on, even the yanks have these. The downtown station in Auckland is a beat only station while Newmarket has some but only constables, get em on bikes!</p>
<p>Secondly, public recycling bins:</p>
<div class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 829px"><img class=" " src="http://i626.photobucket.com/albums/tt348/NZJeremy/095.jpg" alt="" width="819" height="614" /><p class="wp-caption-text">To Landfill or Recycling Centre - simple you&#39;d think</p></div>
<p>These ones are in Christchurch at the International Antarctic Centre but everywhere I went in Wellington and Christchurch you could find these but they are nowhere to be seen in Auckland, they were great, my recycling went up hugely while I was there because I had a choice wherever I was rather than the choice not to recycle or carry my rubbish around with me all day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/18/good-ideas-from-around-nz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An Idea</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/13/an-idea/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/13/an-idea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ARTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty obvious that a better job could be done to market public transport in Auckland. How many people are even aware that it only takes the Northern Express bus 22 minutes to get from Britomart to Constellation Drive off-peak, and 30 minutes during the evening peak? Or that it only takes trains on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty obvious that a better job could be done to market public transport in Auckland. How many people are even aware that it only takes the<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_O6dR7YfvM" target="_blank"> Northern Express</a> bus 22 minutes to get from Britomart to Constellation Drive off-peak, and 30 minutes during the evening peak? Or that it only takes trains on the Eastern Line 14 minutes to get from<a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20east/Eastern%20Line_June%2009%20V11.1%20web.pdf" target="_blank"> Glen Innes to Britomart</a> , no matter what time of day it is?</p>
<p>The idea I had would be for ARTA to somehow get radio stations which give traffic updates on how congested the motorways are each morning and evening, to also mention how the trains are running and how the buses are running along the Rapid Transit Network. I guess occasionally there might be hold ups on the rail network, but a simple message saying &#8220;the Northern Motorway is congested from Greville Road to the Bridge, about a 45 minute drive, or 25 minutes on the Northern Express&#8221; would raise awareness of public transport at exactly the right time &#8211; when people are stuck in traffic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2010/01/13/an-idea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Biggest Transport Stories of 2009</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/23/biggest-transport-stories-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/23/biggest-transport-stories-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 06:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blogging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As we&#8217;re getting pretty close to the end of the year, we have the opportunity to look back at 2009 in a holistic manner. I suppose that overall it has been a topsy-turvy year for transport &#8211; with some particular highs and particular lows. I&#8217;m curious about analysing what people think was the biggest (or perhaps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As we&#8217;re getting pretty close to the end of the year, we have the opportunity to look back at 2009 in a holistic manner. I suppose that overall it has been a topsy-turvy year for transport &#8211; with some <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/24/more-details-on-the-electrification-announcement/" target="_blank">particular highs</a> and<a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/05/19/government-takes-us-back-to-the-60s/" target="_blank"> particular lows</a>. I&#8217;m curious about analysing what people think was the biggest (or perhaps the series of biggest) transport stories for 2009.</p>
<p>Here are some ideas I have (going somewhat chronologically):</p>
<ol>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/01/27/alpurt-b2/" target="_blank">The opening of the Orewa-Puhoi Motorway</a>. Massive traffic jams and Steven Joyce&#8217;s announcement that he wanted to extend the motorway to Wellsford.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/03/16/the-public-transport-roller-coaster/" target="_blank">The cancellation of the Regional Petrol Tax</a>, throwing into doubt rail electrification, integrated ticketing and a variety of other projects.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/03/25/government-roading-policy-i-mean-transport-policy/" target="_blank">Changes to the Government Policy Statement</a>, shifting masses of money into state highway building and away from other transport areas.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/03/31/my-thoughts-on-the-royal-commissions-report/" target="_blank">The Super City announcements</a> (partly related to transport!)</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/05/14/another-waterview-connection-post/" target="_blank">The changes to the Waterview Connection route</a> (which have subsequently largely been reversed).</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/05/24/our-bridge/" target="_blank">The Harbour Bridge Crossing</a>. My word that was an enormous amount of fun &#8211; for one morning we stuck it to NZTA and took back the Harbour Bridge.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/06/04/another-nail-in-the-public-transport-coffin/" target="_blank">The announcement of changes to the Public Transport Management Act</a>. This will most likely be a bigger story during 2010, and didn&#8217;t get much press, but could certainly have some significant repercussions for Auckland transport.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/07/22/thales-wins-integrated-ticketing-contract/" target="_blank">Integrated ticketing contract awarded to Thales</a>. Although there was certainly a lot of drama surrounding this initial announcement in June &#8211; before things were finalised just a few weeks back.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/07/21/say-no-to-bigger-trucks/" target="_blank">The bigger trucks debate</a>. We still haven&#8217;t had it confirmed whether these larger trucks will be allowed on New Zealand&#8217;s roads yet.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/31/cbd-rail-tunnel-study-announced/" target="_blank">Announcement of a study into the CBD Rail Tunnel</a>. Perhaps this could win the award for the most under-recognised transport story of the year.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/28/joyces-2-billion-pet-project/" target="_blank">The Puhoi-Wellsford Motorway debate</a>. Mike Lee&#8217;s &#8220;holiday highway&#8221; term has spread like wildfire.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/26/the-auckland-transport-agency/" target="_blank">The establishment of the Auckland Transport Agency</a> as the transport branch of the future Super City. Originally I thought this was a good step, now I&#8217;m very much not so sure.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/24/government-ruining-electrification/" target="_blank">Possible cutbacks to electrification</a>. Fortunately these didn&#8217;t happen quite so harshly in the end.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/13/onehunga-line-will-it-succeed/" target="_blank">Slow progress on the Onehunga Line</a>. A source of much frustration for public transport campaigners, it finally looks like progress is being made on building the stations for this line.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/09/26/northwest-motorway-widening/" target="_blank">The $860 million widening of the Northwest Motorway</a>. This one came rather out of the blue, and I think is an enormous waste of money due to induced traffic.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/09/23/rail-projects-arcs-top-priority-i-think/" target="_blank">The debate over prioritising projects</a>. Otherwise known as the ARC versus the government.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/29/rlts-released-tomorrow/" target="_blank">The release of the draft Regional Land Transport Strategy</a>. Most probably Auckland&#8217;s best transport strategy in 60 years.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/19/next-harbour-crossing-bridge-or-tunnel/" target="_blank">The debate</a> over whether Auckland&#8217;s next harbour crossing should be a bridge or a tunnel. Personally I vote for a rail tunnel and that&#8217;s it.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/13/bus-lockout-an-end-in-sight/" target="_blank">The bus lock-out</a>. I wonder if the NZ Bus public relations person has lost their job yet? What a botch-up that was on their behalf.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/24/more-details-on-the-electrification-announcement/" target="_blank">The announcement of funding</a> for Auckland&#8217;s rail electrification. Yay!</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/10/goodbye-helensville-train-service/" target="_blank">The end of the Helensville train service</a>. Many say it was doomed from the start and I would have to agree &#8211; Helensville is probably just not big enough to justify a rail service.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/21/waterview-connection-route-changes-again/" target="_blank">Another change to the Waterview Connection route</a>! We&#8217;re almost back to where we were pre-May, which I guess is a good thing for the local community.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/15/transmission-gully-to-go-ahead/" target="_blank">Transmission Gully gets the go ahead</a> (not Auckland I know). This is despite it having an incredibly low cost-benefit ratio of around 0.3-0.5.</li>
<li><a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/08/motivation-of-snapper/" target="_blank">The Snapper/Thales battle over integrated ticketing</a>. I think in the end <a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/07/integrated-ticketing-contract-signed-at-last/" target="_blank">Thales have won</a> &#8211; although that will depend on the extent to which the PTMA is gutted next year.</li>
</ol>
<p>A pretty busy year all up actually. The two issues which drove the most traffic to this site were, interestingly enough, the May Waterview Connection announcement and the October bus lockout.</p>
<p>Your thoughts? Top story? Top 5? Anything I&#8217;ve missed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/23/biggest-transport-stories-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sunday PT &#8211; very unimpressive</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/13/sunday-pt-very-unimpressive/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/13/sunday-pt-very-unimpressive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrated Ticketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NZ Bus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Timetable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I was asking for it, hoping to take public transport from Herne Bay to Sylvia Park on a Sunday and expecting it to not be complete and utter rubbish. Although, on the other hand past experiences haven&#8217;t been too bad. Although the bus route from here into town, and train from Britomart to Sylvia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose I was asking for it, hoping to take public transport from Herne Bay to Sylvia Park on a Sunday and expecting it to not be complete and utter rubbish. Although, on the other hand past experiences haven&#8217;t been too bad. Although the <a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20central/Ponsonby_Herne%20Bay_Aug%2009%20web.pdf" target="_blank">bus route from here into town</a>, and <a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20east/Eastern%20Line_June%2009%20V11%20web.pdf" target="_blank">train from Britomart to Sylvia Park</a> only run at half-hour intervals on Sundays (does anyone actually know why Sunday timetables have to be different to Saturdays, the patronage never seems hugely different?) usually in the past they have aligned reasonably. Well today proved everything wrong, and to me really showed in perfect clarity everything that is wrong with public transport in Auckland.</p>
<p>For a start, after leaving house (at a random time, I know, I probably should live my life to a timetable) my daughter Amalia and I reached the top of our street to see a damn 017 bus sitting at the bus stop. We ran like crazy towards it, and it didn&#8217;t move &#8211; until we reached it and discovered that it wasn&#8217;t our bus, but rather a broken down bus waiting for assistance. It would have been nice for the driver to change his sign to read &#8220;Not in Service&#8221; rather than leaving it showing the route and its destination. As the next bus was around 20 minutes away (and possibly not guaranteed to arrive in any case) we decided to walk to Ponsonby (only about 5-10 minutes away) so that we could catch the <a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20central/Link%20Brochure_Oct%2007%20web.pdf" target="_blank">Link Bus</a>, which runs every 15 minutes on a Sunday.</p>
<p>While waiting for the Link Bus, not one but two 017 buses decided to come along, but of course since we were at the bus stop for the Link Bus and not the 017, they didn&#8217;t stop for us &#8211; even with much vigorous arm-waving to try to encourage a driver to take pity on a guy with his 5 year old daughter &#8211; but to no avail. Eventually, our Link Bus did come along &#8211; and I think it had been quite a long gap since the last one as the people we were waiting at the bus stop with had got the point of making pointed loud comments wondering whether the bus would ever show up. Then the trip on the Link Bus into town seemed to take an age &#8211; perhaps we were just unlucky with the lights but I&#8217;m sure that my usual 005 bus trip doesn&#8217;t take as long as this Link trip did &#8211; even though they basically follow the same route.</p>
<p>Eventually we made it to Britomart, and were reasonably in luck to find out that our train was &#8220;only&#8221; 8 minutes away. I bought tickets (bloody annoying that my bus pass can&#8217;t be used on trains, perhaps that can be the first part of integrated ticketing to be sorted out) and we went down to the platforms to wait for the train. Oddly enough, even though the train we were due to catch was the next one departing from Britomart, platform 2 (the platform for our train) was the only one without a train at it. As the time our train meant to depart came and went, there was a platform announcement that it was running 5 minutes late. Goodness knows how you can stuff up running trains on-time on a Sunday, but I&#8217;m amazed at the depths Auckland&#8217;s system can plumb so I wasn&#8217;t surprised. Eventually the train did show up in the Britomart tunnel (around 5 minutes after scheduled departure time) &#8211; but then bizarrely sat there for a couple of minute doing nothing. I imagined at first it was waiting for a train within the station to leave, but as none was due to leave until after us, I really don&#8217;t know what was going on &#8211; I can perhaps imagine something along the lines of the following conversation between the train driver and whoever runs the signalling/trackwork:</p>
<p><em>Driver:</em> Ah yeah, I&#8217;m in the tunnel, can I proceed to platform 2.<br />
<em>Britomart station person:</em> Sorry, the guy who&#8217;s meant to be doing the points is just finishing his lunch, can you hold on for a couple of minutes.<br />
<em>Driver:</em> Yeah sure, no worries.<br />
<em>Britomart station person:</em> OK he&#8217;s back, now let&#8217;s go through a 14,894 step procedure to do this.</p>
<p>Perhaps I am being a bit uncharitable, but it does seem as though the whole organisation of getting trains in and out of Britomart is run on 19th century pen-and-paper technology, and there is an enormous lack of urgency about everything. Yes sure, it&#8217;s a Sunday, but still if your train is getting towards 10 minutes late a little bit of effort to get the train into the platform, and then out again ASAP wouldn&#8217;t go amiss. Eventually we were on our way again &#8211; and the trip between Britomart and Sylvia Park passed by fairly quickly. Somewhat annoyingly, even though we were on a four-car ADK set two of the carriages were closed off so everyone had to crowd together into two carriages rather than being able to spread ourselves out throughout the whole train. Hopefully that becomes a thing of the past once we have automated ticketing on our trains! Below is a photo of our train as we got off it at Sylvia Park:</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><img class="size-full wp-image-2496 aligncenter" title="IMAG0009-small" src="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/IMAG0009-small.jpg" alt="IMAG0009-small" width="800" height="600" /><br />
By this stage it had probably been well over an hour since we originally left home. But anyway, we did our shopping &#8211; which was reasonably successful now as I am about halfway through all my Xmas shopping &#8211; and then left the mall to catch a train at around 2.15pm. Unfortunately that meant we had just missed the previous train, but I figured the wait wouldn&#8217;t be too long, as we reached the station at around 2.20pm &#8211; meaning around a 20 minute wait until the next train was due to come along. By this time I was starting to get a bit tired, as was Amalia &#8211; although she&#8217;d done pretty well so far to walk all the way to the bus stop, then walk around the shopping centre for a couple of hours. At around 2.44pm, when the next train was supposed to arrive a train did come along but it just barrelled straight through the station at around 100kph &#8211; a bit freaky when you&#8217;re expecting it to stop. I figured that perhaps it was just running as something of a support train to provide greater frequencies out of the city, and that our one would come along fairly shortly. But no, it took until 3.10pm &#8211; almost 50 minutes since first arriving at the station &#8211; until our train finally came along and whisked us back to the city. Certainly spent a long time staring at this view:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="size-full wp-image-2497 aligncenter" title="IMAG0010-small" src="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/IMAG0010-small.jpg" alt="IMAG0010-small" width="800" height="600" /></p>
<p>Fortunately from there it didn&#8217;t take too long for the 017 bus to come along, and although that bus took forever to get us home (thanks to the million sets of traffic lights on Queen Street that give no prioritisation to buses) we eventually made it &#8211; only around two hours after first leaving the mall. Overall, it was quite depressing to realise the incredibly sorry state of Auckland&#8217;s public transport on a Sunday. The terribly frequencies, the train that just decided it didn&#8217;t feel like stopping for us at Sylvia Park, the general lack of urgency from all involved in trying to keep things to the timetable &#8211; and the general amateurish feeling I got. I heard at least four of five people throughout the day commenting on how terrible Auckland&#8217;s public transport system is, and those were only the ones within earshot.</p>
<p>I must say I thought we&#8217;d got beyond the point of Auckland&#8217;s public transport being a complete embarrassment. Perhaps today was just a bit of a bad day, or are all Sundays like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/12/13/sunday-pt-very-unimpressive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pet Peeves</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/24/pet-peeves/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/24/pet-peeves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of little things about Auckland that makes you realise how wrong we have our priorities when it comes to transport. Little things that we just get wrong, or things that show how generally public transport is looked at with disdain, or how pedestrians are seen as second-rate citizens, even in supposedly pedestrian-oriented [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a number of little things about Auckland that makes you realise how wrong we have our priorities when it comes to transport. Little things that we just get wrong, or things that show how generally public transport is looked at with disdain, or how pedestrians are seen as second-rate citizens, even in supposedly pedestrian-oriented areas such as the CBD. This post is intended to create a list of little things that Auckland just get wrong, which it shouldn&#8217;t, and which could be fixed quite easily (and cheaply) <strong>if only someone gave a damn</strong>.</p>
<ol>
<li>Why can&#8217;t bus drivers on the Link Bus at Victoria Park tell you exactly how long it will be until their timetable says they&#8217;ll be leaving again?</li>
<li>Why is the pedestrian traffic light near the intersection of Durham Street and Queen Street so pathetic in taking so long to give pedestrians a turn that everyone jay-walks across the road anyway?</li>
<li>Why is the right-turn arrow phase from Queen Street into Karangahape Road (heading up Queen Street) so short? A lot of buses need to make that turn, so it&#8217;s stupid to give them such a short phase.</li>
<li>Why are pedestrians crossing Jervois Road at the intersection with Redmond Street and Dedwood Terrace held in such disdain that they have to wait <em>two phases</em> to cross the road?</li>
<li>Why is graffiti around the motorway system cleaned up almost immediately while that along the railway corridors stays in place for months, if not years?</li>
<li>How on earth can Manukau City Council justify giving Great South Road a speed limit of 70kph as it passes through their town centre? Do they want to kill off pedestrians?</li>
<li>Why does there have to be a difference between the <a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20central/Ponsonby_Herne%20Bay_Aug%2009%20web.pdf" target="_blank">004 and 005 bus routes</a>? I mean seriously, what does that do other than confuse people and put passengers off using the service?</li>
<li>Why is our main street a four-lane highway? (OK that can&#8217;t be particularly easily fixed, but it&#8217;s annoying all the same!)</li>
<li>Why is the <a href="http://www2.maxx.co.nz/assets/timetable%20central/New%20North%20Rd_June%2009%20V2.0%20web.pdf" target="_blank">224 bus</a> always 15 minutes late?</li>
<li>Why are we able to roll out real-time information signs for buses (seemingly quite a complicated task), but not for trains (seemingly a relatively simple task)?</li>
</ol>
<p>Please feel free to add in your &#8220;pet peeves&#8221; about Auckland and its transport system. Perhaps I will be able to gather them all together and email them to a whole bunch of people at Councils, ARTA, NZTA, KiwiRail or whoever else is responsible and we can get some action on the simple stuff we should be getting right, but just aren&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/11/24/pet-peeves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Untangling the effects of petrol price on transport</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/17/untangling-the-effects-of-petrol-price-on-transport/</link>
		<comments>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/17/untangling-the-effects-of-petrol-price-on-transport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=1476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;ve spend a couple of hours digging through information on oil prices, petrol prices, state highway traffic levels and public transport patronage, to hopefully come up with some interesting information on the relationship between petrol prices and transport.</p>
<p>Logic tells us that as petrol prices increase we would expect fewer people to drive and more people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;ve spend a couple of hours digging through information on <a href="http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/rwtcd.htm" target="_blank">oil prices</a>, <a href="http://www.aa.co.nz/motoring/owning/running-costs/petrolwatch/Pages/default.aspx" target="_blank">petrol prices</a>, <a href="http://www.transit.govt.nz/content_files/shtv/SHTG-200907.pdf" target="_blank">state highway traffic levels</a> and <a href="http://www.arta.co.nz/home/archived_business_reports.html" target="_blank">public transport patronage</a>, to hopefully come up with some interesting information on the relationship between petrol prices and transport.</p>
<p>Logic tells us that as petrol prices increase we would expect fewer people to drive and more people to catch public transport. When we look at what has happened to petrol prices, traffic levels of state highways and public transport patronage since January 2007, we do see that trend to some extent, although there are enough exceptions (especially in terms of public transport patronage, which varies a lot month to month) that the relationship seems a bit more complicated than I had potentially thought. For a start, here&#8217;s the table I put together:<a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/oil-transport.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1477" title="oil-transport" src="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/oil-transport.jpg" alt="oil-transport" width="568" height="505" /></a> The trend seems most obvious throughout 2008, where between March and September we saw petrol prices above $1.80 a litre, significant decreases in road use, and significant increases in public transport use. If we look back at 2007 we can see for most of the early part of that year petrol prices were significantly lower than they had been throughout 2006, and as a result traffic volumes were also up on the year before. Public transport use throughout 2007 was pretty poor when compared to 2006 levels, in that while patronage did still increase it was not what might have been expected. So I guess the trend held there too: lower petrol prices, more people driving, less people (comparatively to what might have been expected) catching public transport.</p>
<p>That trend seems to have disappeared in 2009 though. Ever since November last year we&#8217;ve seen significant reductions in petrol prices &#8211; with prices being up to 30-40c a litre cheaper than they were in the same month of the previous year. However, with the exceptions of a few months (most notably July 2009) we haven&#8217;t really seen state highway use recover the ground that it &#8220;lost&#8221; during 2008. I guess quite a lot of that might be due to the recession, but the public transport trends also show us something quite interesting. Put simply, it really does appear as though people who first tried public transport in 2008 due to the higher petrol prices &#8211; have decided to stick with it this year, even though price of petrol has come down a lot.</p>
<p>The graph below shows the clear trend between petrol prices and traffic levels, although as can be seen the relationship with public transport use is a bit less obvious:<a href="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/petrolpricegraph.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1478" title="petrolpricegraph" src="http://transportblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/petrolpricegraph.jpg" alt="petrolpricegraph" width="659" height="345" /></a> Months where the yellow line is above the pink line shows that public transport patronage growth is higher than state highway traffic growth. No surprises that it mostly happened when petrol prices were highest.</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what happens in the next few months. Perhaps the lower prices will finally kick through into more traffic growth compared to public transport growth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/08/17/untangling-the-effects-of-petrol-price-on-transport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
