<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Integrated Ticketing fiasco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertyscott</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3975</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertyscott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3975</guid>
		<description>Is Thalys talking about an ITSO based smartcard, beyond Oyster and Octopus (which have insufficient capacity to carry multiple types of tickets)?  Oyster is yesterday&#039;s technology, it would be good for Auckland to move beyond that, because the more functionality and flexibility, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Thalys talking about an ITSO based smartcard, beyond Oyster and Octopus (which have insufficient capacity to carry multiple types of tickets)?  Oyster is yesterday&#8217;s technology, it would be good for Auckland to move beyond that, because the more functionality and flexibility, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3950</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 03:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3950</guid>
		<description>Yeah they happen occasionally... all good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah they happen occasionally&#8230; all good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3946</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 02:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3946</guid>
		<description>Weird, wasn&#039;t expecting that.

Apparently the above is called an automatic pingback. I linked to this blog post from my own blog and somehow a copy of it showed up here? Was that supposed to happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, wasn&#8217;t expecting that.</p>
<p>Apparently the above is called an automatic pingback. I linked to this blog post from my own blog and somehow a copy of it showed up here? Was that supposed to happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transport integration (or lach thereof) - Delivering Without Wheels</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3945</link>
		<dc:creator>Transport integration (or lach thereof) - Delivering Without Wheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 01:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3945</guid>
		<description>[...] Fortunately the Monthly Discovery pass I&#8217;ll have for November will mean it will be easier for me to transfer than it is for most people. There is no such thing as an integrated &#8220;A&#8221; zone pass for the Auckland City area, for example. The otherwise excellent Northern Pass is regionally limited to North Shore trips, with a slight rail extension. A shame really, as the Northern Pass model (based, I believe, on Melbourne&#8217;s excellent Metlink fare structure, if not their tickets) would have made a really good interim integrated ticket for Auckland, while we wait for the smartcard system (which is another story). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fortunately the Monthly Discovery pass I&#8217;ll have for November will mean it will be easier for me to transfer than it is for most people. There is no such thing as an integrated &#8220;A&#8221; zone pass for the Auckland City area, for example. The otherwise excellent Northern Pass is regionally limited to North Shore trips, with a slight rail extension. A shame really, as the Northern Pass model (based, I believe, on Melbourne&#8217;s excellent Metlink fare structure, if not their tickets) would have made a really good interim integrated ticket for Auckland, while we wait for the smartcard system (which is another story). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3805</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3805</guid>
		<description>For an interim solution all we need to do is extend the Northern Pass to cover the whole city.

(The Northern Pass divides the North Shore into two zones, and offers two-hour, daily, and weekly tickets. It seems to be loosely based on Melborune&#039;s Metcard fare system, albeit on paper).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For an interim solution all we need to do is extend the Northern Pass to cover the whole city.</p>
<p>(The Northern Pass divides the North Shore into two zones, and offers two-hour, daily, and weekly tickets. It seems to be loosely based on Melborune&#8217;s Metcard fare system, albeit on paper).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sydneyhasatunnel</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3773</link>
		<dc:creator>sydneyhasatunnel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3773</guid>
		<description>Jon&#039;s post was excellent wasn&#039;t it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon&#8217;s post was excellent wasn&#8217;t it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3749</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3749</guid>
		<description>Latest news is that the changes to the PTMA aren&#039;t happening any time soon. Perhaps the bus lockout made the government think twice about having Infratil determine their transport policies?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest news is that the changes to the PTMA aren&#8217;t happening any time soon. Perhaps the bus lockout made the government think twice about having Infratil determine their transport policies?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick R</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3748</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3748</guid>
		<description>So where does that now stand with the modified PTMA reforms? Is that still possible even, or do operators of commercial routes still get to do whatever the hell the feel like without anything making them play along?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where does that now stand with the modified PTMA reforms? Is that still possible even, or do operators of commercial routes still get to do whatever the hell the feel like without anything making them play along?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3745</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3745</guid>
		<description>Well before integrated ticketing turned into a debacle with the cancellation of the regional petrol tax in March this year I think that was the plan. ARTA&#039;s timelines for integrated ticketing pointed towards a simple system being introduced by the end of this year, with the smart-card system to follow later on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well before integrated ticketing turned into a debacle with the cancellation of the regional petrol tax in March this year I think that was the plan. ARTA&#8217;s timelines for integrated ticketing pointed towards a simple system being introduced by the end of this year, with the smart-card system to follow later on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick R</title>
		<link>http://transportblog.co.nz/2009/10/24/integrated-ticketing-fiasco/#comment-3741</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 01:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportblog.co.nz/?p=2078#comment-3741</guid>
		<description>They could, and should, bring in a paper time-based integrated ticket as the first phase. That would make some immediate improvements and get people (and ARTA/the providers) used to the new fare style before the electronic cards are introduced, rather than changing both the fare structure and the payment method in one go. The Australian experience suggests that switching to RFiD cards is problematic enough, without a fundamental change in the way fares work at the same time.

I can&#039;t see any reason why they could not extend the northern pass to all operators, as all operators can print a simple ticket and people are supposed to hang on to their receipt for the duration of the journey anyway. People could still use the individual operators stored value cards in the meantime also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They could, and should, bring in a paper time-based integrated ticket as the first phase. That would make some immediate improvements and get people (and ARTA/the providers) used to the new fare style before the electronic cards are introduced, rather than changing both the fare structure and the payment method in one go. The Australian experience suggests that switching to RFiD cards is problematic enough, without a fundamental change in the way fares work at the same time.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see any reason why they could not extend the northern pass to all operators, as all operators can print a simple ticket and people are supposed to hang on to their receipt for the duration of the journey anyway. People could still use the individual operators stored value cards in the meantime also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

